Stephen Blank is a Senior Fellow for Russia at the American Foreign Policy Council. He came to AFPC from the US Army War College where he spent 24 years as a Professor of National Security Studies at the Strategic Studies Institute of the US Army War College in Carlisle Barracks, Pennsylvania. Dr Blank's expertise covers the entire Russian and post-Soviet region. He has also written extensively on defense strategy, arms control, information warfare, energy issues, US foreign and defense policy, and European and Asian security.
Sunday, October 29, 2017
News Reviews and Opinions: 3:59 PM 10/29/2017 - Trump, Assange, Bannon, Farag...
News Reviews and Opinions: 3:59 PM 10/29/2017 - Trump, Assange, Bannon, Farag...: Recent News Stories Saved Stories - None Trump, Assange, Bannon, Farage bound together in an unholy alliance - The Guardian Trum...
Friday, October 13, 2017
"Не мытьем, так катаньем."
- Las Vegas Shooting: Expert on Stephen Paddock's Motive
- Silicon Valley Is Not Your Friend - The New York Times
- Byron York: Reasons to stay calm about those Russia Facebook ads
- YORK: 10 reasons to stay calm about Facebook ads | Opinion | goshennews.com
- The return of Russian nationalism
- The return of Russian nationalism - Financial Times - Google Search
- The return of Russian nationalism – FT Books Essay | The World News and Times
- What drives Russia’s Korea policy?
- Germany: Trump’s Iran plans driving EU toward Russia and China – EURACTIV.com
- What Trump's move on Iran means for the US and the world - CNNPolitics
- Donald Trump just sealed his own fate - Palmer Report
____________________________________________
Quote:
"Ultimately, Gabriel told the newspaper group, there were only three countries – the United States, Russia and China – that could avert a new nuclear arms race.
“But those countries mistrust each other so much at the moment that they are not working together sufficiently. It must be in our interest to press for more trust.”"
M.N. comments: Read: "Deutschland uber Alles", part 2: "Without us, the Germans, these barbarians will destroy each other and the World. It is our historical role and mission now, to be the guardians of the Civilization!"
"Не мытьем, так катаньем."
_______________________________________
To discuss what's driving Russia's Korea policy, we need a framework within which we can begin to understand Moscow’s motives regarding North Korea’s nuclearisation and the ensuing international crisis.
First, peace and stability on the Korean Peninsula and more broadly in Northeast Asia are vital Russian interests. Russia fought four wars over Korea in the 20th century, including its pilots’ participation in the Korean War, so the issue of peace on the Peninsula is hardly a minor one for Russia. Moreover, any new war might quickly go nuclear and could even involve a clash between Washington and Beijing. Those contingencies - and the proximity of North Korea to Russia - could destroy any hope for Russia to regenerate its Asian provinces or, worse, force it to enter into a war on behalf of China over an issue where it has no control or leverage over the protagonists. That would not be in its best interests – indeed, for any state it would be a nightmare.
First, peace and stability on the Korean Peninsula and more broadly in Northeast Asia are vital Russian interests. Russia fought four wars over Korea in the 20th century, including its pilots’ participation in the Korean War, so the issue of peace on the Peninsula is hardly a minor one for Russia. Moreover, any new war might quickly go nuclear and could even involve a clash between Washington and Beijing. Those contingencies - and the proximity of North Korea to Russia - could destroy any hope for Russia to regenerate its Asian provinces or, worse, force it to enter into a war on behalf of China over an issue where it has no control or leverage over the protagonists. That would not be in its best interests – indeed, for any state it would be a nightmare.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)