Political Opposition in Russia

Political Opposition in Russia - GS   

Full coverage

Political Opposition in Russia - Google Blog Search was added into: 

Russia News Review

Nemtsov - GS

russia ethnic conflict - GS

russia ethnic conflict - GS

News for michael mcfaul: US Ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul may resign before New Year

michael mcfaul - GS

1. News for michael mcfaul

   1. US Ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul may resign before New Year

      The Voice of Russia ‎- 1 day ago

      US Ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul is going to leave his post in Russia, Gazeta.ru reports referring to sources close to the Russian ...

      
      

      michael mcfaul - Google Blog Search was added into: 
      
      

      Russia News Review

      
      

"Vladimir Putin" and "Putinism" (Google Blog Searches) were added into the "Russia News Review"

vladimir putin - GS and putinism - GS

vladimir putin - Google Blog Search and

Putinism - Google Blog Search were added into: Russia News Review 

Britain’s and Russia’s special services are thawing their relationship after six years of frosty tensions – in the interests of Sochi security.

MI6 in from the cold? UK and Russia confirm they will share Sochi intel

Published time: November 08, 2013 17:33

MI6 building in London (Reuters / Toby Melville)

Share on tumblr

Tags: Intelligence, Politics, Russia, Security, UK

As Russian Olympic officials work to ensure the ski slopes are cold enough for the 2014 Winter Games, Britain’s and Russia’s special services are thawing their relationship after six years of frosty tensions – in the interests of Sochi security.

In a parliamentary hearing Thursday, John Sawers, the head of MI6, said that British intelligence services are passing the experience they gained from the 2012 Summer Olympics in London to Russia for the Sochi Games.

"We passed the Olympic flame on from London to Sochi, and we have a certain responsibility there, and we will take it forward step-by-step," Sawers said.

The confirmation that MI6 will cooperate fully with their Russian counterparts on counter-terrorism measures for Sochi comes as Moscow and London have started sharing secret intelligence for the first time in more than six years. Relations between the two countries’ special services nosedived after the infamous scandal involving the death in London of former Russian agent Aleksandr Litvinenko in late 2006 rocked the international community.

Intelligence cooperation between Russia’s Federal Security Service (FSB) and Britain’s MI6 was halted after Litvinenko’s death. He was fatally poisoned with the radioactive agent Polonium-210, and mutual recriminations about who was responsible for his death soured relations between the two agencies.

After six years of strained relations, London and Moscow will be exchanging security information to ensure that the Winter Olympics, which run February 7-23 in the Black Sea resort city of Sochi, go off without a hitch, a member of the State Duma Committee on Security and Anti-corruption, the former head of the FSB Nikolai Kovalev, said Friday.

Kovalev said that as the terrorists, despite language barriers and differences in banking systems, "act in coordination," so should the world’s security services.

The intelligence community “is torn apart by internal contradictions, we suspect each other, we cannot take any joint action,” Kovalev said. “It should be cooperative work of all the intelligence agencies of the world, which should take care of the athletes, and in general ensure the safety of [the Olympics]."

Amid the mistrust which arose following the spying scandal concerning the US National Security Agency’s surveillance of EU leaders and its cooperation with Britain’s GCHQ, London’s decision to offer full cooperation over Sochi was expected, and is the right one, Kovalev said.

“This is the right and the long-awaited decision made by the British, especially amid the mistrust which has risen in the European community after the scandal surrounding the activities of the NSA."

from: us russia relations - Google News

British and Russian Intelligence Services Resume Collaboration

08 November 2013 | Issue 5251

By Anna Dolgov

YouTube / Truthloader

MI6 Chief John Sawers at the parliamentary hearing on Thursday.

Britain has started sharing intelligence information with Russia for the first time since the fallout over the death of former Russian agent Alexander Litvinenko in an effort to assist security preparations for the Sochi Winter Olympics, a top MI6 official said.
With Russia hosting the Winter Olympics in February, British intelligence services are exchanging some of the experience they gained from the 2012 Summer Olympics in London, MI6 chief Sir John Sawers told a committee of British lawmakers Thursday.

"We passed the Olympic flame on from London to Sochi, and we have a certain responsibility there, and we will take it forward step by step," Sawers said.
Sawers said there had been a "gap" in which the Russian and British intelligence services didn't talk to each other about intelligence matters due to the acrimony caused by Litvinenko's death and the investigations that followed it.
The British government "took a series of measures" after former Federal Security Services (FSB) agent Litvinenko died in London in 2006 from polonium poisoning, but the Russian authorities have not sufficiently cooperated with Britain on the case, Sawers said.
Litvinenko said that the Russian authorities had plotted to kill late tycoon Boris Berezovsky, and accused the FSB of organizing a series of Russian apartment building bombings that prompted the start of the second Chechen War in 1999. Litvinenko fled to Britain and sought asylum in 2000, after a series of criminal charges were leveled against him in Russia.
The circumstances of his poisoning remain unknown, though two Russian former secret service agents who met with him in a London restaurant hours before he fell ill have been suspected.

---

Security documents leaked by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden have helped al-Qaida and other terrorist groups by impelling them to change the way they communicate, said Sir Iain Lobban, director of the Government Communications Headquarters, who also gave evidence at Thursday's meeting.
Foiling terrorist plans will become "far, far harder" in the following years, Lobban said.
Terrorists are "rubbing their hands with glee" and "lapping it up," Sawers said, also referring to Snowden's decision to divulge information to the media.
The security chiefs were unwilling to explain how the leaks could damage their organizations' effectiveness in greater detail, only saying that much of their success rests upon terrorists not knowing what security services are doing.

Read more: http://www.themoscowtimes.com/olympic_coverage/article/british-and-russian-intelligence-services-resume-collaboration/489238.html#ixzz2k97CTUpD
The Moscow Times 

» British and Russian Intelligence Services Resume Collaboration ...
08/11/13 06:02 from intelligence services - Google Blog Search

from: Russia, China, Iran and Latin America - Blogs Review

M.N.: Learn your history

Learn your history. Leave behind the historically fallacious, dysfunctional, counterproductive, self-destructive paradigm of the ideological (and by extension military and other types of) competition stemming from the centuries old, half forgotten and senseless Christian religious struggles; or this atavistic luggage will destroy you, just like it destroyed your historical predecessor empires. Learn the truth rather than ideologies. Be at least as much, if not more scientists than the fighters-conquerors-robbers-politicians. Try to understand the nature of your wounds and help to get them healed by simple supportive measures and hope for the best. Most importantly, get rid of the criminality, of the pervasive criminal element in the state, social and cultural structures. Leave the issues of the wounds of others (if any) to others, you are not to understand and to deal with them. Work on your paradigm shift. See the details in my today lecture, type it up and submit it back to me for proofreading, corrections, additions, expansions and attachment of links and references. Hey, hey, hey! Stop this nonsense and get real. 
Michael

bogdanov - GS

Alexander Bogdanov

Physician

Alexander Aleksandrovich Bogdanov was a Russian physician, philosopher, science fiction writer, and revolutionary of Belarusian ethnicity. Wikipedia

Born: August 22, 1873, Sokółka, Poland

Died: April 7, 1928, Moscow, Russia

Education: Moscow State University

Books: Red Star: the First Bolshevik Utopia

People also search for

Nikolai Bukharin

Nadezhda Krupskaya

Lev Kamenev

Anatoly Lunacharsky

Grigory Zinoviev

alexander bogdanov - GS


alexander bogdanov vs lenin - GS

1. Lenin: A Letter to A. A. Bogdanov and S. I. Gusev

   www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1905/feb/11.htm‎
   

   
   

   A Letter to A. A. Bogdanov and S. I. Gusev. ... Not one of them is interested in it orfinds it necessary to discuss it. And now—by wire.... A nice business: we talk of ...
2. 
   

   Bogdanov and Lenin: Epistemology and Revolution - jstor

   www.jstor.org/stable/20099591‎
   

   
   

   by DG Rowley - ‎1996 - ‎Related articles

   materialism, empiriocriticism. Alexander Bogdanov is remembered by Western historians of Bol shevism as a moderate alternative to Lenin. The only Bolshevik.

   
   

   
   

   alexander bogdanov and lenin - GS
   
   
   
   

   V. I.   Lenin

   A Letter to A. A. Bogdanov and S. I. Gusev

   ---

   Published: First published in 1925 in the magazine Proletarskaya Revolutsia, No. 4 (39). Published according to the manuscript.
   Source: Lenin Collected Works, Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1962, Moscow, Volume 8, pages 143-147.
   Translated: Bernard Isaacs and The Late Isidor Lasker
   Transcription\Markup: R. Cymbala
   Public Domain: Lenin Internet Archive (2003). You may freely copy, distribute, display and perform this work; as well as make derivative and commercial works. Please credit “Marxists Internet Archive” as your source.
   Other Formats:   Text • README

   ---

   February 11, 1905

   I wired my consent to your changes yesterday, although I emphatically do not agree with what I could gather from your letter. But I am so sick of this procrastination, and your questions seemed such a mockery, that I just gave it up, thinking, If only they did something! If only they gave notice of the Congress, any kind of notice, so long as they gave it, instead of just talking about it. You will be surprised at my use of the word mockery. But just stop and think: two months ago I sent my draft to all members of the Bureau.^[1] Not one of them is interested in it or finds it necessary to discuss it. And now—by wire.... A nice business: we talk of organisation, of centralism, while actually there is such disunity, such amateurism among even the closest comrades in the centre, that one feels like chucking it all in disgust. Just look at the Bundists: they do not prate about centralism, but every one of them writes to the centre weekly and contact is thusactually maintained. You only have to pick up their Posledniye Izvestia^[2] to see this contact. We, however, here are issuing the sixth number of yet one of our editors (Rakhmetov) has not written a single line, either about or for Vperyod. Our people “talk” of extensive literary connections in St. Petersburg and in Moscow, and of the Majority’s young forces, while we here, two months after the issuance of the call for collaboration (the announcement of Vperyod and a letter in connection with it), have seen or heard nothing from them. The Russian committees   (Caucasus, Nizhni-Novgorod, not to speak of the Volga region or the South) consider the Bureau a “myth”, and with perfect justification. We did “hear” from strangers about some sort of alliance between the St. Petersburg Committee of the Majority and a group of Mensheviks, but from our own people not a word. We refuse to believe that Bolsheviks could have taken such an imbecilic, suicidal step. We did “hear” from strangers about a conference of Social-Democrats and the formation of a “bloc”, but from our own people not a word, although there are rumours that this is a fait accompi. Evidently, the members of the Majority are anxious to be imposed upon again.

   Our only strength lies in utter frankness, in solidarity, and indetermined assault. But people, it seems, have gone soft now that we have a “revolution”! At a time when organisation is needed a hundred times more than ever before they sell out to the disrupters. It is evident from the proposed changes in the draft of the declaration and Congress call (set forth in the letter so vaguely as to be almost unintelligible) that “loyalty” has been put on a pedestal. Papasba^[3] actually uses that word, adding that if the centres are not mentioned, no one will come to the Congress! Well, gentlemen, I can wager that if   t h i s is the way you are going to act, you will never have a congress and never escape from under the thumb of the Bonapartists of the Central Organ and the Central Committee. To call a congress against the central bodies, in which lack of confidence has been expressed, to call this Congress in the name of a revolutionary bureau (which, if we are to pay slavish obeisance to the loyal Party Rules, is non-existent and fictitious), and to recognise the unqualified right of the nine Bonapartists, the League (ha! ha!), and the Bonapartist creatures (the freshly hatched committees) to attend that Congress, means to make our selves ridiculous and to lose all right to respect. The centres may and should be invited, but to accord them voting status is, I repeat, madness. The centres, of course, will not come to our Congress anyway; but why give them another chance to spit in our faces? Why this hypocrisy, this game of hide-and-seek? It is a positive shame! We bring the split into the open,   we call the Vperyod-ists to a congress, we want to organise a Vperyod-ist party, and we break immediately any and all connections with the disorganisers—and yet we are having loyalty dinned into our ears, we are asked to act as though a joint congress of Iskra and Vperyod were possible. What a farce! The very first day, the very first hour of the Congress (if it does take place) will beyond doubt ring down the curtain on this farce; but until the Congress meets such deceit can do us untold harm.

   Really, I sometimes think that nine-tenths of the Bolsheviks are actually formalists. Either we shall rally all who are out to fight into a really iron-strong organisation and with this small but strong party quash that sprawling monster, the new-Iskra motley elements, or we shall prove by our conduct that we deserve to go under for being contemptible formalists. How is it that people do not understand that prior to the Bureau and prior to “Vperyod” we did all we could to save loyalty, to save unity, to save the formal, i.e., higher methods of settling the conflict?! But now,after the Bureau, after “Vperyod”, the split is a fact. And when the split had become a fact it became evident that materially we were very much weaker. We have yet to convert our moral strength into material strength. The Mensheviks have more money, more literature, more transportation facilities, more agents, more “names”, and a larger staff of contributors. It would be unpardonable childishness not to see that. And if we do not wish to present to the world the repulsive spectacle of a dried-up and anaemic old maid, proud of her barren moral purity, then we must understand that we need war and a battle organisation. Only after a long battle, and only with the aid of an excellent organisation can we turn our moral strength into material strength.

   We need funds. The plan to hold the Congress   i n   L o n d o n is sublimely ridiculous, for it would cost twice as much. We cannot suspend publication of Vperyod, which is what a long absence would mean. The Congress must be a simple affair, brief, and small in attendance. This is a congress for the organisation of the battle. Clearly, you are cherishing illusions in this respect.

   We need people to work on Vperyod. There are not enough of us. If we do not get two or three extra people from Russia   as permanent contributors, there is no sense in continuing to prate about a struggle against Iskra. Pamphlets and leaflets are needed, and needed desperately.

   We need young forces. I am for shooting on the spot any one who presumes to say that there are no people to be had. The people in Russia are legion; all we have to do is to recruit young people more widely and boldly, more boldly and widely, and again more widely and again more boldly, without fearing them. This is a time of war. The youth—the students, and still more so the young workers—will decide the issue of the whole struggle. Get rid of all the old habits of immobility, of respect for rank, and so on. Form hundreds of circles of Vperyod-ists from among the youth and encourage them to work at full blast. Enlarge the Committee threefold by accepting young people into it, set up half a dozen or a dozen subcommittees, “co-opt” any and every honest and energetic person. Allow every subcommittee to write and publish leaflets without any red tape (there is no harm if they do make a mistake; we on Vperyod will “gently” correct them). We must, with desperate speed, unite all people with revolutionary initiative and set them to work. Do not fear their lack of training, do not tremble at their inexperience and lack of development. In the first place, if you fail to organise them and spur them on to action, they will follow the Mensheviks and the Gapons, and this very inexperience of theirs will cause five times more harm. In the second place, events themselves will teach them in our spirit. Events are already teaching everyone precisely in the Vperyod spirit.

   Only you must be sure to organise, organise, and organise hundreds of circles, completely pushing into the back ground the customary, well-meant committee (hierarchic) stupidities. This is a time of war. Either you create new, young, fresh, energetic battle organisations everywhere for revolutionary Social-Democratic work of all varieties among all strata, or you will go under, wearing the aureole of “committee” bureaucrats.

   I shall write of this in Vperyod^[4] and speak of it at the Congress. I am writing to you in one more endeavour to evoke   an exchange of ideas, to call upon you to bring a dozen y o u n g,   f r e s h workers’ (and other) circles into direct contact with the Editorial Board, although ... although between ourselves be it said, I do not cherish the slightest hope that these daring ideas will be fulfilled, unless, perhaps, two months from now you will ask me to wire whether I agree to such-and-such changes in the “plan”.... I reply in advance that I agree to everything. Good-bye until the Congress.

   Lenin

   P.S. You must make it your aim to revolutionise the delivery of Vperyod into Russia. Carry on widespread propaganda for subscriptions from St. Petersburg. Let students and especiallyworkers subscribe for scores and hundreds of copies to be sent to their own addresses. It is absurd to have fears on this score in times like these. The police can never intercept all the copies. Half the number or a third will arrive, and that amounts to very much. Suggest this idea to any youth circle, and it will find hundreds of ways of its own to make connections abroad. Distribute addresses more widely, as widely as possible, for the transmission of letters to Vperyod.

   ---

   Notes

   [1] See present edition, Vol. 7, pp. 540-42.—Ed.

   [2] The Latest News.—Ed.

   [3] See Note 22.—Ed.

   
   

   [4] See pp. 211-20 of this volume.—Ed.