Tuesday, March 18, 2014

Global leaders respond to Putin's signing of treaty

Global leaders respond to Putin's signing of treaty

1 Share
Published on Mar 18, 2014
The speed of President Vladsamir Putin's actions took the international community by surprise The international community has reacted to the signing of the treaty by threatening Russia with economic and political isolation. Al Jazeera's Simon McGregor-Wood reports.

Putin’s Brave New Russia 

1 Share
Trouble, even when expected, can come at unexpected times. For many months, Russians have expected that authorities would begin to block Internet sites that publish opinions from opposition leaders, activists and supporters.


Demonstrations Continue Over Ukraine 

1 Share
Two protesters in front of Kazan Cathedral on Mar. 15 address what they see as an information war being raged over Ukraine.The police allowed a protest against Russia’s military intervention in Ukraine on Mar. 15 despite City Hall’s refusal to authorize the gathering. Held near the Kazan Cathedral on the eve of the Crimean referendum on joining Russia, the protest drew between 500 and 600 people.


Putin’s Olympics End In Shadow of Crimea 

1 Share
Triumphant in the midst of global condemnation, President Vladimir Putin clinked his champagne flute with sports leaders, toasting the success of his pet project in Sochi.


Putin Signs Treaty Making Crimean Peninsula Part of Russia

1 Share
Russian President Vladimir Putin has signed a treaty to make Ukraine's Crimea part of Russia, angering the United States and European Union.Mr. Putin Tuesday signed the document with the prime minister of Crimea's regional government , the speaker of its parliament, and the mayor of the city of Sevastopol , where Russia's Black Sea fleet is based. Earlier, Mr. Putin told the Russian parliament that Crimea has always been an "inalienable" part of Russia. He said...

Russia’s Most Wanted Man Reported Dead 

1 Share
A Chechen jihadist website appeared to confirm months of rumors on Tuesday that Doku Umarov, the feared Islamist warlord who threatened the Sochi Olympics last year, was dead.
Years of similar reports of the death of Russia’s most wanted man have been met with skepticism. But this report is being treated as more reliable because it comes from his sympathizers at the Kavkaz Center, which the Wall Street Journal called “the de facto mouthpiece for Islamist rebels fighting in Russia.”
The report did not elaborate on how, or when, Umarov died but it corresponded with the release of a YouTube video posted by a man calling himself Ali Abu Muhammed, who claimed to be his replacement. In the report, Umarov was labeled a “martyr” who had “given 20 years of his life to the Jihad.”
Chechen leader Ramzan Kadyrov also announced the same report on his well known Instagram feed. If Umarov’s death is confirmed by Russian security services, this would be a major success for Russian President Vladimir Putin as he continues to stamp out the Islamist insurgency in the North Caucasus.
The former Chechen rebel had aimed to establish a caliphate, and united several militant groups in Dagestan, Chechnya and other Caucasus provinces under his leadership. Caucasus Emirate has claimed responsibility for a string of deadly attacks over the last few years, including a bombing at a Moscow airport in 2010 and one on a city subway the following year.
He called on his followers last July to use “maximum force” to disrupt the Winter Olympics that were held in Sochi last month. No attacks took place during the Games, but Umarov’s group was widely believed to be behind two December blasts in the transportation hub of Volgograd, largely seen as a gateway to Sochi, which killed more than 30 people.
Next Page of Stories
Loading...
Page 2

Former U.S. Ambassador to USSR: Let Russia Take Crimea

1 Share
Once American and Western leaders have vented their anger at President Vladimir Putin for bringing the Crimea back into Russia, they should find a way to tone down the poisonous public rhetoric and concentrate on private negotiations to put the rest of Ukraine together again. The fact is, like it or not, Ukraine is almost certainly better off without Crimea than with it. Nothing weakens a nation more than holding territory whose residents prefer to belong to another country.
Though they may be difficult for all relevant parties to accept, the premises of a solution to the Ukrainian mess are clear: 1) The new constitution should provide for a federal structure of government giving at least as many rights to its provinces as American states have; 2) The Russian language must be given equal status with Ukrainian; and 3) There must be guarantees that Ukraine will not become a member of NATO, or any other military alliance that excludes Russia.
Is there any historical precedent that might suggest that a solution of this sort is feasible? Yes, absolutely. Just take a close look at Finland. After losing territory to the Soviet aggressor in 1939 and failing to regain it in the “continuation war” it fought during World War II, the Finns accepted the unjust territorial losses they had suffered, but proceeded to build one of the most successful, prosperous, and self-reliant societies on the planet today. How did they do it? First, they united the majority Finnish-speaking and minority Swedish-speaking citizens by granting equal language and cultural rights. Second, they were careful to do nothing to irritate the Soviet Union next door, even though one of its “republics” had significant numbers of Finnish-speaking Karelians. Third, they were careful not to join NATO though they eventually became a full member of the European Union without Russian objection.
It is an irony that the issue that produced the demonstrations on the Maidan in Kyiv that eventually morphed into a revolution —the association agreement with the European Union — would not have solved Ukraine’s deep problems. Nor would the Russian aid ousted Ukrainian president Yanukovich accepted have helped Ukraine solve its internal problems of economic and political division and economic failure rooted in its Soviet communist heritage. If either of these options had been followed, Ukraine would have become an economic and political liability to its ostensible benefactor.
The status of Crimea has been a distracting and complicating factor in Ukraine’s efforts to form a sense of nationhood out of disparate elements. Historically, Crimea has been Russian since the late 18th century and some of the most noted battles in Russian history occurred there, battles enshrined in the Russian sense of nationhood. Lev Tolstoy fought in the defense of Sevastopol during the Crimean War and wrote about it. (That was the war that inspired Alfred, Lord Tennyson to write “The Charge of the Light Brigade” — “Ours not to reason why; Ours but to do and die.” This would seem to be an appropriate motto for many of today’s screaming polemicists.)
As for Russia, one should be aware that President Putin’s actions have been widely popular in Russia. His standing in polls has improved noticeably. As in other countries, the image of standing up to malign foreigners pays political dividends. And in Russia, public pressure from the American president is particularly unwelcome, given the history of what Russians perceive as systematic American neglect of Russian national interests since the end of the Cold War.
The possession of Crimea will impose substantial costs on Russia. Aside from those generated by sanctions, there will be greater ones caused by paying pensions, improving infrastructure, and paying for services from Ukraine, where Crimea gets water, power, natural gas, and many other necessities. Some Russian economists have estimated that the costs of needed infrastructure improvement will exceed the scores of billion dollars spent around Sochi to prepare for the winter Olympics. Russians may soon tire both of these expenses and of other tensions flowing from the Crimean grab. Russian Crimeans, expecting an immediate improvement in their living standards, are sure to be disappointed when it doesn’t occur. Thus, in a year or so, many may consider Crimea a liability rather than asset for Russia.
The crucial problem now, however, is not Crimea and its status, however emotional both Russians and Ukrainians may feel. It is what will happen to Ukraine. Those who wish Ukraine and its citizens well must understand that only Ukrainians can solve their problems. Outsiders can hinder or help but cannot unify a fractured state. As yet, Ukrainians have not found a leader able to unify its people, but that doesn’t mean there never will be one. If there is, he or she will pay close attention of how the Finns pulled it off.
The international community can best help by keeping in touch with all the relevant parties to encourage a solution that can provide Ukrainians with an inclusive government able to conduct needed but difficult reforms, including strengthening the rule of law and establishing an independent and competent judiciary. Only then will Ukraine be able to initiate and carry out the economic reforms necessary for competitiveness in the rapidly changing world economy.
And the United States? The American government should follow the physicians’ admonition: “Above all, do no harm.” Public polemics are not helpful and should be kept at a minimum. Sanctions promised should be applied. But American diplomats should not try to lead the Western effort to deal with Russia but rather should keep in close touch with the various negotiations in progress and give diplomatic support to those that seem most promising. For the best advice, all should look to the Finns.
Jack F. Matlock Jr., ambassador to the U.S.S.R. from 1987 to 1991, is the author of Reagan and Gorbachev: How the Cold War Ended.
Read the whole story
 
· · · · · ·

Crimea conflict: Ukraine authorises use of weapons in self-defence 

1 Share
Ukrainian military orders troops to protect themselves after soldier was killed in military base nearSimferopol
Ukraine has ordered its troops in Crimea to use their weapons to protect themselves after a soldier was killed when pro-Russian forces stormed a military base near Simferopol – the first military casualty since the peninsula was occupied by Russian forces three weeks ago.
"The conflict is shifting from a political to a military stage," said Ukraine's interim prime minister, Arseniy Yatsenyuk, at an emergency government meeting on Tuesday night. "Russian soldiers have started shooting at Ukrainian military servicemen, and that is a war crime." Moscow has not yet responded.
A Ukrainian military spokesman, Vladislav Seleznyov, said that one soldier had died and another was injured after they were shot when the base was attacked by "unknown forces, fully equipped and their faces covered". It was unclear whether the assailants were Russian troops or pro-Moscow militiamen, who have been active in their support for Crimea's occupation.
Hundreds of Ukrainian troops and administrative staff remained trapped inside military and naval compounds across Crimea. Until now they had been ordered to avoid using their weapons.
Earlier this week the Russian defence ministry reportedly told Ukrainian soldiers they had until Friday to leave the region or face military action. Meanwhile, a deal was reportedly reached between Russian and Ukrainian commanders to allow supplies and people to enter and exit the bases more freely.
But on the ground, tensions appear to have risen in the last few days.
At the entrance to Bakhchysarai military base, the Ukrainian army's insignia had been removed and replaced with a pair of large Russian flags. Just inside the gates, three men in military fatigues – two of them wearing Russian army uniform with no markings – raised their weapons as journalists approached, and threatened to open fire.
Speaking by telephone from inside, Aleksandr Krotov, a captain in Ukraine's naval fleet, said the base was now mostly in the hands of Crimean irregulars and Russian troops, but he and fourteen other officers had been holed up in their offices for 19 days.
"If we leave we cannot go back inside," he said. "This is very clear." Krotov said he and his colleagues, who are guarding Ukrainian military vehicles inside the compound, had been subject to psychological intimidation and threats of physical harm by the forces occupying the base.
"We are only able to go the toilet under armed guard, and we have been threatened with being beaten and killed," Krotov added.
Outside, a small group of Ukrainian soldiers loitered nearby, listening to music in their cars and smoking cigarettes. One of them, who said his name was Yura, said they had been barred from entering since 1 March.
"We are here to support our guys inside," he said. "But if we try to approach the base [the pro-Russian forces] say they will shoot us. Kiev can only offer moral support in this situation, we don't know what will happen next".
Most local soldiers in their unit defected to the new Crimean army last week, which will soon be part of the Russian army. "They threatened to beat us to death if we did not surrender," said Yura.
Outside the base, Nina, the mother of one of the soldiers delivered food to the gate. "We are all very worried about everyone inside, and what could happen," she said.
Evgeniy Cherednichenko, head of armoured service at the logistical command centre in Sevastopol, told a similar story. Speaking by telephone, he said that Russian troops had blocked 50 army officers and 10 administrative personnel from leaving the base since Tuesday morning. "If we try to leave they threaten us with guns, they tell us not to approach the gate," he said.
Cherednichenko, who is from Sevastopol, said that those trapped inside were awaiting commands from Kiev about how to evacuate the base. "We are very anxious of what could happen in these next few days," he said.
Earlier, as news came in that Vladimir Putin had signed a draft bill to annex Crimea, cheers broke out among the armed men blockading another base near Simferopol.
"You are here for a historic moment, we have returned home," said Vladimir Ishmahov, a retired Ukrainian army colonel.
Pro-Moscow militiamen clapped and shook hands with Russian soldiers, while inside the besieged Ukrainian troops, who appeared unable to leave, could only look on as their captors celebrated.

theguardian.com © 2014 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds











Read the whole story
 
· · · · · ·

Official: Soldier killed in Crimea 

1 Share
A Ukrainian officer was killed in Crimea after shooting erupted at a military base. CNN's Michael Holmes reports.
Views: 0
    
ratings
Time: 01:26More in News & Politics

Ukrainian killed in first bloodshed in Crimea

1 Share
Published on Mar 18, 2014
Ukraine said one of its soldiers was killed in Crimea Tuesday in the first case of bloodshed since Russian troops and pro-Kremlin militia seized the rebel peninsula almost three weeks ago. Duration:00:36

Times Minute 3/18/14 | The Costs of Annexation | The New York Times - YouTube

1 Share
Published on Mar 18, 2014
As President Putin announces the annexation of Crimea, a look at the geopolitical costs and how China is closely watching the situation.

In the video:
Putin Signs Treaty to Annex Crimea: http://nyti.ms/1fEvPCP
Tourism Dollars Dry Up, Alongside Crimea's Bank Funds: http://nyti.ms/1gDmPm6
In Poland, Biden Promises Allies Protection: http://nyti.ms/1kFXuIO

US Reassures Allies As Tensions Mount on Russian Borders

1 Share
U.S. Vice President Joe Biden held talks in Poland on Tuesday aimed at reassuring eastern European allies that they have the support of the United States. His visit took place as Moscow signed a treaty to make the Ukrainian region of Crimea part of the Russian Federation. The tensions and military build-up are unnerving the region.   Standing alongside Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk, Biden condemned Moscow’s move to make Crimea part of Russia. “Russia has offered a variety of...

Next Page of Stories
Loading...
Page 3

Times Minute 3/18/14 | The Costs of Annexation | The New York Times 

1 Share
As President Putin announces the annexation of Crimea, a look at the geopolitical costs and how China is closely watching the situation. Subscribe on YouTube...
Views: 14
    
ratings
Time: 01:14More in News & Politics

If History Is a Guide, Crimea’s Enthusiasm Might Not Last

1 Share
Giorgi Karapetovi, right, at home with Gela Gelashvili, a neighbor. Mr. Karapetovi lost some of his farm land after Russia reinforced the administrative border of South Ossetia with a fence.

Chechen warlord who threatened Sochi reported dead - STLtoday.com

1 Share

Daily Mail

Chechen warlord who threatened Sochi reported dead
STLtoday.com
MOSCOW (AP) — An Islamic militant group in Russia's North Caucasus is reporting the death of its leader, who had threatened to attack Sochi Olympics and was one of Russia's most wanted men. The death of Chechen warlord Doku Umarov has been ...
'Russian bin Laden' Doku Umarov killed, report saysWashington Times
Chechen rebel leader Doku Umarov 'dead'BBC News

all 44 news articles »

No comments:

Post a Comment